Cit vs mysore chromite ltd

Author: gipi

August undefined, 2024

WebJan 14, 2013 · In the opinion of the CIT (Appeals), the language used in the rules clearly specified that enhanced depreciation allowance is available only when the trucks are used in the business of running them on hire also. The appellant has only a leasing business and it does not run a business of hiring trucks to the public. WebThe Commissioner of Income-Tax, Madras Vs. Mysore Chromite Limited [1954] INSC 106 (1 November 1954) 2. Navin Chandra Mafatlal Vs. The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Bombay City [1954] INSC 107 (1 November 1954) ... Muir Mills Co., Ltd. Vs. Suti Mills Mazdoor Union, Kanpur [1954] INSC 110 (19 November 1954) 6. P. Joseph John Vs. …

Mahabir Commercial Co. Ltd V. C.i.t. West Bengal, Calcutta

WebMysore Chromite Ltd. (27 ITR 128)(SC), the Supreme court held that the property in the goods passed in London where the bill of lading was handed over to the buyer’s bank … WebNov 3, 2024 · CIT v. Mysore Chromite Ltd. (1955) 1 SCR 849 : AIR 1955 SC 98 Posted on June 30, 2024 CIT v. Mysore Chromite Ltd. (1955) 1 SCR 849 : AIR 1955 SC 98 indiankanoon.org link casemine.com link legitquest.com link Continue reading Posted in LLB III Sem, Special Contracts, Topic 7: Effects of Sale, Uncategorized Leave a comment campeche bailes

Since lessee is not the owner of the asset, depreciation is not …

WebMysore Chromite Limited . DAS, J.— This is an appeal from the judgment pronounced by the High Court of Judicature at Madras on 29th March, 1951 on a consolidated reference … http://courtverdict.com/supreme-court-of-india/ms-i-c-d-s-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-income-tax-mysore-anr WebJan 12, 2024 · CIT (A) has upheld the disallowance of Rs.77,18,481/-being claim of sustainable development expenses by simply recording the fact that “assessee has not adduced any cogent argument for deleting the sustainable development expenses”, without going into the fact that in the earlier years, sustainable development expenses are being … first symptoms of being pregnant

Relaxation of Penalty U/S 271DA for Violation of Section 269ST

Supreme Court Judgments - BCAS

WebMysore Chromite Limited [1954] INSC 106 (1 November 1954) January February March April May June July August September October November December. The … WebJun 30, 2024 · CIT v. Mysore Chromite Ltd. (1955) 1 SCR 849 : AIR 1955 SC 98 indiankanoon.org link casemine.com link legitquest.com link Civil Appeal No. 117 of 1953 … campeche banderaWebFeb 8, 2000 · The High Court relying on its own decision in Ramkumar Mills P. Ltd. v. CIT [1989] 180 ITR 464, answered the question in the affirmative, that is, against the assessee. The aggrieved assessee has preferred this appeal pursuant to a certificate under section 261 of the Act granted by the High Court. first symptoms of early onset dementia

"WebCIT vs. Haryana Urban Development Authority (2010) 322 ITR 61 (P & H) 14.S. 22 - INCOME FROM HOUSE PROPERTY – BUSINESS INCOME - S. 28 . Rent from premises with fittings. Appointment between business income and income from house property held to be justified. CIT & Anr. vs. Mysore Inter Continental Hotel P. Ltd. (2010) 322 ITR 116 … " - Cit vs mysore chromite ltd

Cit vs mysore chromite ltd

CT Case Analysis PDF Invoice Negotiable Instrument

WebMysore Chromite Ltd . (1) held that in respect of the five cases in which the assessee drew the bills in favour of the buyers the sales were effected in Pakistan whereas in the two cases in which the bills were drawn in favour of the assessee's agent at Calcutta, the sales were effected in India. (1) 27 I.T.R. 128. 140 WebMysore Chromite Ltd.(1) held that in respect of the five cases in which the assessee drew the bills in favour of the buyers the sales were effected in Pakistan whereas in the two …

Did you know?

WebMar 9, 2024 · PR CIT Vs LH Sugar Factory Pvt Ltd (D ated: February 27, 2024) On appeal, the Supreme Court condones the delay and grants leave to the Revenue to defend their case against M/s L H Sugar Factory in relation to issue of carbon credit. 2024-TIOL-102-SC-IT CIT Vs Balak Capital Pvt Ltd (D ated: February 27, 2024) WebApr 9, 2016 · The management and control of the assessee company was vested in Messrs. Oakley Bowden & Co. (Madras) Ltd., another private limited company …

WebCommissioner Of Income-Tax, Madras v/sMysore Chromite Limited Case Referred 44 of 1948 Decided On, 29 March 1951 At, High Court of Judicature at Madras By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYANARAYANA RAO & THE HONOURABLE MR. C. S. Rama Rao Saheb, T. T. Viswanatha Ayyar, Advocates. Judgment Text … WebJan 11, 2024 · Relaxation Of The Penalty under Section 271DA For Violation Of Section 269ST Of The Income Tax Act 1961. The Finance Act 2024 introduced a new section 269ST w.e.f. 01.04.17 as follows –. “no person shall receive an amount of two lakh rupees or more—. (a) in aggregate from a person in a day; or.

WebFeb 24, 2016 · Among the factors the court should consider in making this decision are: (1) the weight accorded the plaintiff's choice of forum; (2) the place where the operative facts … WebTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRAS vs MYSORE CHROMITE LIMITED. Supreme Court, 01-11-1954 Judgment Cited in Precedent Map Related Vincent …

WebCIT v Mysore Chromite Ltd (1995) 27 ITR 128 SC Place of Accrual 4. B R Naik V CIT De Jure or De Facto Control section 6 (2) of IT Act, 1961 5. Kunnathat Thathunni Moopil Nair etc., v State of Kerala and another AIR 1961 SC 552 6. Addl CIT v Ram Kripal Tripathi (1980 125 ITR 408 All) Profession value of Benefits (s 2 (24) and 28 (iv) 1961) 7.

Websentative of some of the Indian chromite deposits in Andhra, Bihar, Orissa, Mysore and Madras, and include one specimen from Baluchistan in Pakistan. The location of the main chromite deposits of India is indi-cated on the accompanying sketch map. UsBs on CnnourrB Chromite is used for various purposes which can be classed as metal- campeche baseballWebCIT vs Divine Leasing and Finance Ltd., General Exports and Credits Ltd., Lovely Exports (P) Ltd. Citation 299 ITR 268 197 Taxation 43 158 Taxman 440 207 CTR 38 LexReported COCA-COLA EXPORT CORPORATION vs ITO and ANR.Applied 231 ITR 200 CIT vs Stellar Investment Ltd Distinguished and explained 192 ITR 287 Nirma Industries Ltd. … campeche bayWebThe Commissioner of Income-Tax, Madras Vs. Mysore Chromite Limited [1954] INSC 106 (1 November 1954) DAS, SUDHI RANJAN MAHAJAN, MEHAR CHAND (CJ) HASAN, GHULAM BHAGWATI, NATWARLAL H. Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 (Act XI of 1922), s. 4-Profits derived by the assesseeWhether arose or were received in British Indian in the … campeche bay cantina jacksonville beach flWebMysore Sugar Co. Ltd., AIR 1967 SC 723 107 110 Business Expenditure –Allowability - Tests of distinctions between Business expenditure and Capital expenditure [section … campeche a yucatanWebVodafone Essar Cellular Ltd. Assistant CIT, 2010 Tax LR, 618 (Ker) 14. State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. ... CIT V/s Mysore Chromite Ltd.; 1955, 1 SCR 849. 2. Badri Prasad V/s State of M.P.; 1965, 3 SCR 381. 3. ... The Mogu Liner Ltd. Vs. Manipal Printers and Publishers Pvt. Ltd. AIR 1991 Ker, 183 5. Indian Airlines Vs. first symptoms of hepatitisWeb2 I.C.D.S Ltd v. CIT [2013] 29 taxmann.com 129 (SC) The Supreme Court in the case of Poddar Cement (P.) Ltd.3 and Mysore Minerals Ltd.4 observed that it is the beneficial ownership and not the titular ownership that is relevant for a valid claim of depreciation allowance under the Act. However, in the instant case, the Supreme Court campeche bay jacksonvilleWebCIT v. Mysore Chromite Ltd. (1955) 1 SCR 849 : AIR 1955 SC 98. 37. P.S.N.S. Ambalavana Chettiar v. Express Newspapers Ltd. (1968) 2 SCR 239 : AIR 1968 SC 741. 38. Agricultural Market Committee v. Shalimar Chemical Works Ltd. (1997) 5 SCC 516 : AIR 1997 SC 2502. 39. Pearson v. campeche bay ship