Dalip singh v state of u.p. 2010 2 scc 114
Web[Refer : Dalip Singh v. State of U.P. & Ors. (2010) 2 SCC. 114; Amar Singh v. Union of India & Ors. (2011) 7 SCC 69. and State of Uttaranchal v Balwant Singh Chaufal & Ors. … WebDec 3, 2024 · Dalip Singh vs State Of U.P. & Ors on 3 December, 2009. Law Point: ... In Prestige Lights Ltd. V. State Bank of India (2007) 8 SCC …
Dalip singh v state of u.p. 2010 2 scc 114
Did you know?
WebDec 3, 2009 · State of U.P. & Ors. – Court Verdict. Supreme Court of India. Dalip Singh Vs. State of U.P. & Ors. by Court Verdict · December 3, 2009. Email. Appeal: Civil Appeal … WebJan 13, 2024 · Gulab Singh, 2012 (129) DRJ 128, the Division Bench of this Court following Dalip Singh v. State of U.P. observed that "The Courts are flooded with litigation with false and incoherent pleas and tainted evidence led by the parties due to which the judicial system in the country is choked and such litigants are consuming Court's time for a …
Nov 2, 2024 · Web(a) Constitution of India – Article 136 – Special leave obtained on the strength of misrepresentation – Leave granted liable to be revoked. (Para 2) AIR 1963 SC 1558; AIR …
http://courtverdict.com/supreme-court-of-india/dalip-singh-vs-state-of-u-p-ors WebDalip Singh v. State of U.P. (2010) 2 SCC 114. Landmark Judgment Honourable Supreme Court of India has held that litigants who resort to false and unethical ways to attain …
Web[Refer : Dalip Singh v. State of U.P. & Ors. (2010) 2 SCC. 114; Amar Singh v. Union of India & Ors. (2011) 7 SCC 69. and State of Uttaranchal v Balwant Singh Chaufal & Ors. (2010) 3 SCC 402]. 30. Access jurisprudence requires Courts to deal with the. legitimate litigation whatever be its form but decline to exercise
WebJudgment Summarized by Delhi Law Academy – Jaipur. In a suit for possession of land and for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from alienating the land by way of … black gay characters on tvWebMay 31, 2016 · In Dalip Singh v. State of U.P., 2010 2 SCC 114, the Supreme Court observed that a new creed of litigants have cropped up in the last 40 years who do not have any respect for truth and shamelessly resort to falsehood and unethical means for achieving their goals. The observations of the Supreme Court are as under:-. black gay bars in oakland caWebdalip singh vs. state of u p - supreme court of india - december 03, 2009. ... the state of u.p. and ors. [laws(all)-2010-10-367] [referred to] ramjeet upadhyaya vs. deputy director … black gay club londonhttp://rajdeepandjoyeeta.com/amar-singh-tapes-supreme-court-lifts-gag-order/ black gay bars in new yorkWeb6. In Prestige Lights Ltd. v. State Bank of India MANU/SC/3355/2007 : (2007) 8 SCC 449, it was held that in exercising power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the High Court is not just a court of law, but is also a court of equity and a person who invokes the High Court's jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution black gay bars new yorkWebSanjay Singh & Anr v. U.P. Public Service Commission, Allahabad & Anr., (2007) 3 SCC 720 State of Gujarat v. Mirzapur Moti Kureshi Kassab Jamat, (2005) 8 SCC 534 Megh Singh v. State of Punjab, AIR 2003 SC 3184 Suganthi Suresh Ku. v. Jagdeeshan, (2002) 2 SCC 420 East India Commercial Case, AIR 1962 SC 1893 CIT v. black gay club new orleansWebThe Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Dalip Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others, reported in (2010)2 SCC 114 came down heavily on unscrupulous litigants by holding that it is now well established that a litigant who attempts to pollute the stream of justice or who touches the pure fountain of justice with tainted hands, is not ... black gay books for men